There is an interesting article in the TimesOnline, (that is a British newspaper). It is a comment on the UK government’s proposal to come up with laws to offer legal redress and protection for parties involved in a cohabitational arrangement.
An excerpt:
And whereas divorce law entails a panoply of arrangements to protect children, recompense those who sacrificed careers and determine alimony, when cohabiting couples split up there are few enforceable rights for either party.
…
The Government (UK) is therefore now proposing to look again at the implications of cohabitation, and especially at legal protection for those who suffer financially – almost always women – when the relationship ends.
I was thinking about a possible situation and applications in Malaysia.
Obviously we can’t have a law like that in Malaysia, since the situation does not apply. By far and large couples in Malaysia do get married. And it is a waste of parliament time to debate laws that affect only a minority of the population-and who do not even have kids.
But what struck me was the thinking and motivation behind introducing such laws. It is rather clear that such a proposal would be extremely controversial in Malaysia, would not be quite so in the UK, even among conservatives who value marriage and family.
It begs the question why the controversy in Malaysia? Cynical-minded me would think that we are more concerned about labels and reputation and religiosity and some abstract notion of “Asian values”. Too blind perhaps to see the positive side of such laws, which would offer protection to children born out of wedlock and unmarried women at the losing end of a broken relationship.
Incidentally, in the US, it is found that incidences of single parenthood and divorce are higher among those who are at the lower end of the wage and education scale. I have a nagging suspicion that this will be so in Malaysia, if not already.
Debates of this nature are like debates concerning AIDS prevention. In a country like Malaysia, do you promote the condom or promote abstinence? It would be a tragedy if all we did was to confine discussions to the level of “social debate” and the average Pengajian Am karangan. Real people are involved.
Recent Comments