During a recent get together with Raj and his care group mates ( I was invited although I am not a member of his CG), he broached the recent controversy on 377A.
On the Singapore blogosphere, it seems to me that plenty of bloggers have taken issue with Dr. Thio Li Ann’s speech in Parliament on the merits of retaining the said act. This is her speech in full.
This is a compilation of responses from Mr. Wang Says so.
I’m of the opinion that Dr. Thio’s speech does not constitute hate-speech.
Born and bred in KL, Malaysia. Now studying for his Phd in Singapore. Learning to walk one fall at a time.
0 Responses to “Comparative response”